Monday, October 25, 2010

Reconsidering Perspective on Grammar

I read the piece "Reconsidering Some Perspective Rules of Grammar and Composition," by Bradford R. Connaster, and I found it very interesting. He set out to try to explain that there were two different types of grammar in the language that we use to communicate, and they are organic grammar and perspective grammar. He explains organic grammar as the grammar that has been hard-wired into our brains and that we understand from the way we heard it and first developed it. The perspective grammar is the grammar that was taught to us in school and the way that grammar "attempts" to explain the way of a language. He says attempt because he says that there are exceptions and that not everything can be understood through guidelines and explanations. I agree with this and I think he is on to something. He goes on to point out how a reader who has an issue with either their perspective or organic grammar can be thrown off by the usage of the writer in the same area. They may have an inner conflict with these relationships and it will interrupt and affect their reading of the piece as a whole. I believe that at times there is a want to write things a certain way because of the way they make sense in sounding them out or following rules, but we can't do it because it breaks either our organic grammar or our perspective grammar. I also strongly agree at the end when he says perhaps becoming an expert means that a different code of writing is applied for the audience one is writing for and there are different codes for all different audiences. He says that we should write in different ways and that discriminating in this way is a good thing, because it can make what one is writing have a much stronger effect. I agree but it also makes me nervous because I feel I haven't completely understood my own yet. Anyone else have thought?

Monday, October 18, 2010

Individual Web Site

I am starting to design my first web site for Writing for the Web and my first impression on my own is that it is much harder than I thought. It really isn't hard in the sense of making a page, becasue I feel that almost anyone can do that if they can just understand how to work the program. The hard thing about designing my own website is being able to be original, but also effective. I want my page to be unlike anyone elses
I have seen, but it's hard when those sites are my interpretation of an effective website. I find myself designing a lot of stuff on my page that I've seen before and while it looks good and works well, it isn't original. When I try to be original and coem up with something new it feel like it is almost being forced, and I feel it ends up actually taking away from the website more than it adds. It may be a problem with me and the fact that I don't tihnk I'm a very visually creative guy, but it's hard to think of better ways to explain or show your informatuion without using some of the methods that the best web sites use, becasue that is precisely why they are the best web sites. I'd like to try to do something that nonoe has done before andf be effective at it, like a navigation toolbar in the center of the page or something, but at the same time that doesn't seem practical. I'm still working on finding that medium that will make me happy with my personal web project, catches people's eyes, but still is very useful to both me and anyone needing information about me.

Monday, October 11, 2010

My Thoughts on Visual Rhetoric

     Visuals seem like they are always a godo thing to include with any written assignment. Everyone knows just reading the information given can be boring and unappealing, so everyone tries to spice up their documents using some sort of visual rhetoric. The Internet made this even more prevelant as images were able to be shared very easily amongst people and the same picture can be used a countless number of times without the knowledge of the original publisher of the image. It is funny becasue soon we will be able to place some sort of visual for any idea or document we are considering, but the question is whether or not this is always a good thing. I have noticed that a lot of images are used for the purpose of purely decorative and there is no new or sometimes even no information at all in certain pictures that can relate to a topic. In thisi nstance, a person should refrain from using these images as they will not only act as a minor distraction to the document and will actually take away from its overall effectiveness. The key is to use images that really can display the information in am roe effective way, by visualizing it rather than reading it off the page and internall visualizing it. Images should be a vision for thei nformation that the author came up with in order to not have to make the reader do it themselves. The image should aid the reader, rather than distract them. Visual Rhetoric as I see it is not always a good thing, but it can be very effective if used the right way.

Monday, October 4, 2010

My Experience With Web Writing

Web Writing has been something that I have grown up reading. I remember the days when my dad would read the newspaper every morning as we would have breakfast. I would ask him how he could read so many articles everyday and he would tell me it's the way he keeps up with what's going on in the world. By the time I reached an age where what happened around me had much more relevance to my life, I was reading articles from things such as yahoo.com and my cellphone. These articles are written for a different audience than the ones my father read, because they are more for scanning than ever before. A person reading an article for the web is probably not going to spend as much time on that article as one would if they were reading a newspaper. Also, it has become more important to provide alternative copies than ever before becasue people want to know what is being said in a faster and more time-friendly manner. Just as my dad grew up around newspaper writing being the main form of mass communication in society, I have grown up around web writing as the main form of mass communication. Web writing is important to understand becasue the writer wants to best get across to their reader that which they are writing about. Effectiveness to me is the most important thing becasue it opens up the subject for further discussion and interest. Much more can come out of something written if it leaves an impression on the reader, whatever the methods used may be.